https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70457
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 38156 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38156&action=edit Patch that permits this to compile The attached patch allows the compilation to succeed in spite of the incorrect number of arguments provided to pow (). I suppose this is a reasonable approach, but it makes me a bit queasy to let obviously incorrect code go by undiagnosed. Still, it's no different than providing the wrong number of arguments to some other function; we only notice here because we convert the function call to a built-in. CCing Richard for his opinion.
