https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70366
--- Comment #5 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #4) > Created attachment 38076 [details] > patch > > Hi, > The attached patch suggested by Richard fixes the chromium build. > It passes bootstrap+test on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > and cross-tested on arm*-*-* and aarch64*-*-*. > The patch however regresses libstdc++ for arm-none-eabi: > http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross-validation/gcc-test-patches/ > 234391-70366/arm-none-eabi/diff-libstdc++-rh60-arm-none-eabi-arm-cortex-a9- > default.txt > Looking at the logs there isn't much information: > compiler exited with status 1 > FAIL: 25_algorithms/partial_sort/moveable.cc (test for excess errors) > Excess errors: > exit status is 1 > WARNING: 25_algorithms/partial_sort/moveable.cc compilation failed to > produce executable > The complete log is at: > http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross-validation/gcc-test-patches/ > 234391-70366/arm-none-eabi/libstdc++-rh60-arm-none-eabi-arm-cortex-a9- > default.log.xz Hi, The failure was probably due to validation issues and not the patch. Re-running the validation didn't show up any regressions on arm*-*-* and aarch64*-*-*. I posted the patch upstream: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg01376.html Thanks, Prathamesh > > I don't have much ideas on how to proceed. > I am trying to reduce the test-case, and reproduce the above regression > locally and will get back if I find more information. > > Thanks, > Prathamesh
