https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2016-03-23
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> So, I'm not worried that the optimization is broken for Sparc (it does the
> right thing for long), but I'm not sure I know the best way to work around
> this for your target. swapping int for long would also help HPPA. HPPA chose
> to skip the test entirely. That might also be right for Sparc.
>
> What do you think?
See what Jeff did for the sibling gcc.dg/ifcvt-5.c test under PR rtl-opt/69942.
