https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70298
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Or more accurately, non-(x86-*-gnu), since x86 with musl libc has the same problem as non-x86 glibc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70298
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Or more accurately, non-(x86-*-gnu), since x86 with musl libc has the same problem as non-x86 glibc.