https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70263
Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> --- Why is reg_equiv[93].init_insns pointing at insn 18 in the first place? Surely insn 18, a decrement of reg 93, gives no useful initialization of reg 93?