https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70162

Nick Clifton <nickc at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2016-03-15
                 CC|                            |nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton <nickc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 37974
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37974&action=edit
Proposed patch

Hi Oleg,

> Nick, do you have any opinion on the patch in c#2?

Yes - I would much prefer to patch the assembler so that it can cope with large
values, even when compiled for a 32-bit host.  That way the assembler will be
able to cope even with source files that are not generated by gcc.

A patch like the one attached here perhaps... :-)

I also happen to like seeing large constants as hex values, as 9 times out of
10, the hex value will make more sense.  (Well at least in my experience
anyway).

Would you like to close this PR and open a binutils one instead, or shall I do
it ?

Cheers
  Nick

Reply via email to