https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70170
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > A small problem is that the second argument to POINTER_PLUS_EXPR is not > signed, but unsigned (sizetype). Which is why I wrote "negative", negative > would mean having the most significant bit set or so. This seems to cause a variety of problems. Since it can be negative, surely it should have ssizetype?
