https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70041
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2016-03-02 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- You could say that, yes. The first case gets disambiguated into two nested loops where we remove the inner "empty" one. The second variant says as a single loop (it happens to have only a single latch at the beginning). Good initial CFG: main (int argc, char * * argv) { long unsigned int i; int D.2253; <bb 2>: i = 0; <bb 3>: i = i + 1; if (i > 536870911) goto <bb 4>; else goto <bb 3>; <bb 4>: __builtin_puts (&"hello"[0]); i = 0; goto <bb 3>; "bad" initial CFG: main (int argc, char * * argv) { long unsigned int i; int D.2253; <bb 2>: i = 0; <bb 3>: if (i > 536870911) goto <bb 4>; else goto <bb 5>; <bb 4>: __builtin_puts (&"hello"[0]); i = 0; <bb 5>: i = i + 1; goto <bb 3>;