https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70042
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Well, they are not equivalent ;) strlen returns a size_t variable and thus strlen()+1 might wrap around zero ... (ok, insert argument here why strlen() cannot return (size_t)~0 - terminating zero to the rescue!) But I suppose your report wasn't about strlen() + 1 specifically?
