https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6) > On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278 > > > > --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> --- > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > > > CCing Uros for the followup ICE. Apply > > > > Following patch should fix the ICE: > > > > --cut here-- > > Index: config/i386/i386.c > > =================================================================== > > --- config/i386/i386.c (revision 233864) > > +++ config/i386/i386.c (working copy) > > @@ -7794,6 +7794,10 @@ type_natural_mode (const_tree type, const CUMULATI > > { > > machine_mode innermode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (type)); > > > > + /* There are no XFmode vector modes. */ > > + if (innermode == XFmode) > > + return mode; > > + > > Are there TFmode vector modes? Yes, insn-modes.h says so at least. > No V1<float>modes there though, just V1<int>modes. Yes, vector TFmodes are present, and they work OK. > Will you test this or shall I? The patch was bootstrapped and regression tested, together with your patch. So, I'd say it is ready to be applied.
