https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15826
--- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12) Thank your for catching it. I did actually read all the comments. The trouble is that there are several test cases here and I missed the one in the second half of comment #6 (the first half of the comment doesn't seem to apply anymore, at least not on x86_64). (In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #13) You're right, the test fails on powerpc64le (though as far as I can see not on any other target with reported test results). It seems like a useful test despite the above so rather than backing it out entirely I could disable it for powerpc64le until it's analyzed. Bill (Seurer or Schmidt), does either of you have a preference for how to handle the failure?
