https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65189
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This was a deliberate change in the contents of the vtable; the destructor for
an abstract class can never be called through the vtable in conforming code, so
we stopped referring to it from the vtable. I would suggest updating ABICC to
ignore this mismatch (for a destructor in a class that also refers to
__cxa_pure_virtual).
