https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2)
Gah; I had typos in some of these; fixing them inline below (I hope):
> With Damerau-Levenshtein, we'd have (I think):
>
> coorzd1 -> coordz1 (Damerau-Levenshtein distance = 1)
> coorzd1 -> coord1 -> coord{xy}[1] (Damerau-Levenshtein distance = 2)
> coorzd1 -> coorzd -> coordz (Damerau-Levenshtein distance = 2)
>
> and hence "coorzd1" would be uniquely closer to "coordz1" than all of the
> other 5 fields.
