https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > > > Created attachment 37791 [details] > > > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37791&action=edit > > > Better Patch > > > > With the patch applied to my working tree (many patches) fixes the PR > > but I see several regressions at run time > > > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocate_with_source_(7|8).f08 * execution test > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_zzz.f03 * execution test > > > > with zzz in (1, 5, 6, 14, 17, 18, 20, 22). AFAICT it "fixes" > > > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/finalize_21.f90 -O scan-tree-dump original "static > > struct __vtype__STAR __vtab__STAR = {._hash=0, ._size=., ._extends=0B, > > ._def_init=0B, ._copy=0B, ._final=0B};" > I just applied the patch posted here to another tree on another machine > and it regtests fine. The failures come from a conflict with your patch for recursive allocatable derived type components. If I revert it, gfortran regtests fine with the patch for this PR with the following patch --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/finalize_21.f90 2015-05-29 11:25:09.000000000 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/finalize_21.f90 2016-02-26 10:39:18.000000000 +0100 @@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ class(*), allocatable :: var end -! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "static struct __vtype__STAR __vtab__STAR = {._hash=0, ._size=., ._extends=0B, ._def_init=0B, ._copy=0B, ._final=0B};" "original" } } +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "static struct __vtype__STAR __vtab__STAR = \{._hash=0, ._size=., ._extends=0B, ._def_init=0B, ._copy=0B, ._final=0B," "original" } }
