https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46459
Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de> ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5)
> The initial test doesn't lead to a segfault any more.
>
> It is now rejected with:
> comment_0.f90:7.8:
>
> call sub(1)
> 1
> Error: Explicit interface required for 'sub' at (1): volatile argument
>
>
> However, the following variant is also rejected with the same error:
>
> call sub(1)
> contains
> subroutine sub(j)
> integer, volatile :: j
> end subroutine sub
> end
With current trunk I get for this testcase:
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0x884c5d0 crash_signal
../../trunk/gcc/toplev.c:335
0x8247bb7 compare_actual_formal
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c:2972
0x8248f02 gfc_procedure_use(gfc_symbol*, gfc_actual_arglist**, locus*)
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c:3441
0x82a0753 resolve_specific_s0
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:3282
0x82a0753 resolve_specific_s
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:3302
0x82a0753 resolve_call
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:3456
0x82a8b14 gfc_resolve_code(gfc_code*, gfc_namespace*)
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:10613
0x82ab342 resolve_codes
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:15529
0x829a1aa gfc_resolve
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:15563
0x829a1aa gfc_resolve
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:15543
0x828ec38 resolve_all_program_units
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/parse.c:5551
0x828ec38 gfc_parse_file()
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/parse.c:5803
0x82d2a55 gfc_be_parse_file
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:201
