https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69686
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to wipedout from comment #0) > So here there's only once reasonable way to put parentheses and the warning > is useless. But how long does it take most readers of the code to do that analysis and conclude only one arrangement makes sense? Isn't it better to just add the parentheses to disambiguate it so the meaning is obvious immediately? Which is what the warning suggests. The warning is working exactly as designed, if you don't like it disable the warning.
