https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63805
Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Martin, per the description of _atomic_load in the GCC manual, this appears to
be invalid code. Do you disagree? Of course we should probably die more
gracefully, but in both cases _atomic_load appears to be called in an invalid
manner.
