https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #6) > Backtrace from gdb: > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x0000000010cfcf74 in reg_save_code(int, machine_mode) [clone .lto_priv.8969] > () > (gdb) bt > #0 0x0000000010cfcf74 in reg_save_code(int, machine_mode) [clone > .lto_priv.8969] () > #1 0x0000000010f4d62c in save_call_clobbered_regs() () > #2 0x0000000010c20af8 in reload(rtx_insn*, int) () > #3 0x0000000010c173f0 in (anonymous > namespace)::pass_reload::execute(function*) [clone .lto_priv.2787] () > #4 0x0000000010635e5c in execute_one_pass(opt_pass*) () > #5 0x0000000010780420 in execute_pass_list(function*, opt_pass*) [clone > .localalias.70] [clone .lto_priv.4009] () > #6 0x0000000010683234 in cgraph_node::expand() () > #7 0x0000000010630cf4 in symbol_table::compile() () > #8 0x0000000010685bf4 in symbol_table::finalize_compilation_unit() () > #9 0x00000000105f09dc in compile_file() [clone .lto_priv.2960] () > #10 0x0000000010547f20 in toplev::main(int, char**) () > #11 0x0000000010545bf0 in main () Yes. That is the same as mine.
