https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68730

--- Comment #12 from Ilya Enkovich <ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> Reverting r232500 and r232413 results in the miscompilation again.  So if
> those changes are optimizations only we have a latent issue.

Those changes fix performance regression and were not supposed to resolve any
stability issue.

Reply via email to