https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25071
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #12) > AFAICT everything is fixed, but for > comment 7 preferring an error instead of the warning. Since warnings can be > turned into errors with -Werror, I don't think this PR should stay opened. I disagree: Code like comment #0 should give an error by default. That's also what other compilers do (e.g. ifort & sunf95) and I don't see how this can be a useful 'extension'. It is certainly problematic code.
