https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28366
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2016-01-24
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
With -mcpu=power7 and later, gcc emits the following optimal code for the test
case. With -mcpu=power6 and prior, I can confirm that the does look
suboptimal.
In light of the -power7 output and the fact that this has been open for 10
years with no activity, should the bug be closed as WONTFIX?
$ /build/gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-trunk/gcc -Wall -Wextra -O2 -maltivec
-O2 -mabi=altivec -m64 -S -o/dev/stdout -mcpu=power7 t.c
.file "t.c"
.machine power7
.section ".toc","aw"
.section ".text"
.align 2
.p2align 4,,15
.globl f
.section ".opd","aw"
.align 3
f:
.quad .L.f,.TOC.@tocbase,0
.previous
.type f, @function
.L.f:
xvdivsp 34,34,35
blr
.long 0
.byte 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
.size f,.-.L.f
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 6.0.0 20160119 (experimental)"
-mcpu=power6 code:
$ /build/gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-trunk/gcc -Wall -Wextra -O2 -O2
-maltivec -O2 -mabi=altivec -m64 -S -o/dev/stdout -mcpu=power6 t.c
.file "t.c"
.machine power6
.abiversion 2
.section ".toc","aw"
.section ".text"
.align 2
.p2align 4,,15
.globl f
.type f, @function
f:
addi 10,1,-176
li 9,32
stvx 2,10,9
li 9,48
stvx 3,10,9
li 9,64
stvx 2,10,9
li 9,80
stvx 3,10,9
li 9,96
stvx 2,10,9
li 9,112
stvx 3,10,9
li 9,128
stvx 2,10,9
li 9,144
stvx 3,10,9
li 9,160
lfs 0,-128(1)
lfs 10,-144(1)
fdivs 10,10,0
lfs 11,-108(1)
lfs 0,-92(1)
fdivs 11,11,0
lfs 12,-72(1)
lfs 0,-56(1)
fdivs 12,12,0
lfs 9,-20(1)
lfs 0,-36(1)
fdivs 0,0,9
stfs 10,-16(1)
stfs 11,-12(1)
stfs 12,-8(1)
stfs 0,-4(1)
lvx 2,10,9
blr
.long 0
.byte 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
.size f,.-f
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 6.0.0 20160121 (experimental)"
.section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
