https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254 > > --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > I think this will require moving out the common_handle_option handling of > -fsanitize{,-recover}= arguments (parsing them into a bitmask) into a separate > function, because lto-wrapper seems to look at unparsed options. Parts of it can go to opts-common.c I think though I wonder if you can't handle the most important parts with just the unparsed code? After all you have to "emit" unparsed opts as well.
