https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69177
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Yeah, I don't consider 50000 LOC "large" and thus I find it unreasonable to regress in diagnostic quality here. At some point I'd rather take the bullet of making location_t grow from 32bit to 64bit (if that helps). It's mostly tree_decl_minimal that would regress (others don't pack well or like tree_block could use a range).
