https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68758
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Is your gcc configured with --enable-valgrind-annotations ? Hello Jakub. So the problem is that even though the configure option was passed to configure, valgrind discard magic is done just in case ENABLE_VALGRIND_CHECKING, as added in: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg00044.html I would consider it better to guard the valgrind code in case ENABLE_VALGRIND_ANNOTATIONS: diff --git a/gcc/ggc-common.c b/gcc/ggc-common.c index c919ba8..9b291aa 100644 --- a/gcc/ggc-common.c +++ b/gcc/ggc-common.c @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ gt_pch_save (FILE *f) ggc_pch_prepare_write (state.d, state.f); -#if defined ENABLE_VALGRIND_CHECKING && defined VALGRIND_GET_VBITS +#if defined ENABLE_VALGRIND_ANNOTATIONS && defined VALGRIND_GET_VBITS vec<char> vbits = vNULL; #endif @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ gt_pch_save (FILE *f) this_object_size = state.ptrs[i]->size; this_object = XRESIZEVAR (char, this_object, this_object_size); } -#if defined ENABLE_VALGRIND_CHECKING && defined VALGRIND_GET_VBITS +#if defined ENABLE_VALGRIND_ANNOTATIONS && defined VALGRIND_GET_VBITS /* obj might contain uninitialized bytes, e.g. in the trailing padding of the object. Avoid warnings by making the memory temporarily defined and then restoring previous state. */ @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ gt_pch_save (FILE *f) state.ptrs[i]->note_ptr_fn == gt_pch_p_S); if (state.ptrs[i]->note_ptr_fn != gt_pch_p_S) memcpy (state.ptrs[i]->obj, this_object, state.ptrs[i]->size); -#if defined ENABLE_VALGRIND_CHECKING && defined VALGRIND_GET_VBITS +#if defined ENABLE_VALGRIND_ANNOTATIONS && defined VALGRIND_GET_VBITS if (__builtin_expect (get_vbits == 1, 0)) { (void) VALGRIND_SET_VBITS (state.ptrs[i]->obj, vbits.address (), @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ gt_pch_save (FILE *f) } #endif } -#if defined ENABLE_VALGRIND_CHECKING && defined VALGRIND_GET_VBITS +#if defined ENABLE_VALGRIND_ANNOTATIONS && defined VALGRIND_GET_VBITS vbits.release (); #endif Using the patch, the issue has gone. What do you think about it? Martin