https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272
--- Comment #31 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to wuxiang from comment #30) > (In reply to amker from comment #29) > > I think this is fixed. > > Hi, I saw your patch, and patched it on gcc-4.8.4，but no improvement of > 410.bwaves on x86_64 with gcc-4.8.4. > > The patch improves 410.bwaves by 3-4% on x86_64. > Does this just test with gcc trunk before and afer the patch? Yes, it was tested against trunk. The code/data-structure have been changed a lot since gcc 4.8, it may need some non-trivial change to rebase against 4.8, but I think the basic idea described by comment#5 still holds.
