https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68946
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Hmpf. So we have t.c:16:11: note: node t.c:16:11: note: stmt 0 _39 = iftmp.2_36 | _113; t.c:16:11: note: stmt 1 _113 = iftmp.2_112 | _100; t.c:16:11: note: stmt 2 _100 = iftmp.2_99 | _87; t.c:16:11: note: stmt 3 _87 = iftmp.2_86 | _74; t.c:16:11: note: stmt 4 _74 = iftmp.2_73 | _28; t.c:16:11: note: stmt 5 _28 = iftmp.2_37 | _44; t.c:16:11: note: stmt 6 _44 = iftmp.2_43 | _11; t.c:16:11: note: stmt 7 _11 = iftmp.2_3 | pretmp_19; (see the "recursive use" of _113 for example) and t.c:16:11: note: node (external) t.c:16:11: note: stmt 0 _113 = iftmp.2_112 | _100; t.c:16:11: note: stmt 1 _100 = iftmp.2_99 | _87; t.c:16:11: note: stmt 2 _87 = iftmp.2_86 | _74; t.c:16:11: note: stmt 3 _74 = iftmp.2_73 | _28; t.c:16:11: note: stmt 4 _28 = iftmp.2_37 | _44; t.c:16:11: note: stmt 5 _44 = iftmp.2_43 | _11; t.c:16:11: note: stmt 6 _11 = iftmp.2_3 | pretmp_19; t.c:16:11: note: stmt 7 pretmp_19 = c;