https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68486
--- Comment #17 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> --- On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:15:04AM +0000, jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > Of course. As I stated, it won't hurt anything. > > FAILs in the testsuite are not a problem. The > > issue with EXPR_FUNCTION and cshift is a problem. > > The hurt is for those of us investigating the new regressions... That was 10 > minutes of my time to investigate, multiply that by the number of people > watching for FAILs on their favourite targets (particularly with trunk as it > is > at the end of stage 1) there is certainly enough hurt to go round. > > Please revert the broken testcase and leave it for when you fix pr68227. > It took you 10 minutes to type 68227 into bugzilla's search feature? I intend to commit the fix today. Unfortunately, I have a real job and fixing gfortran is a hobby. Unnecessary code churn in the repo is well unnecessary.
