https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68506
Bug ID: 68506 Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: su at cs dot ucdavis.edu Target Milestone: --- The current gcc trunk miscompiles the following code on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes. This is a regression from 5.2.x. It is likely to do with VRP as -fno-tree-vrp seems to fix the miscompilation. It also seems difficult to further reduce the code. $ gcc-trunk -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc-trunk COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20151122 (experimental) [trunk revision 230719] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; ./a.out $ gcc-5.2 -O3 small.c; ./a.out $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 -fno-tree-vrp small.c $ ./a.out $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c $ ./a.out Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ ------------------------------------------------ int a, b, m, n, o, p, s, u, i; char c, q, y; short d; unsigned char e; static int f, h; static short g, r, v; unsigned t; void __assert_fail (); int fn1 (int p1) { return a ? p1 : p1 + a; } unsigned char fn2 (unsigned char p1, int p2) { return p2 >= 2 ? p1 : p1 >> p2; } static short fn3 () { int w, x = 0; for (; p < 31; p++) { s = fn1 (c | ((1 && c) == c)); t = fn2 (s, x); c = (unsigned) c > -(unsigned) ((o = (m = d = t) == p) <= 4UL) && n; v = -c; y = 1; for (; y; y++) e = v == 1; d = 0; for (; h != 2;) { for (;;) { if (!m) __assert_fail (); r = 7 - f; x = e = i | r; q = u * g; w = b == q; if (w) break; } break; } } return x; } int main () { fn3 (); return 0; }