https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68277
--- Comment #11 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #10) > I'll report back when the regression test currently running is done. I've confirmed that there are no new failures with the new patch on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu. BTW, the ICE for gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-4.c -Os pops up again even with the unmodified tree. So we have no regressions at all.
