https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67295
Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-11-07
CC| |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #3)
> Still no luck on a x86_64-linux-gnu build machine, running ../configure
> --target=arm-none-eabi --disable-shared --disable-nls --disable-threads
> --disable-tls --enable-checking=yes --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
> --with-newlib --with-fpu=neon-fp-armv8 --with-arch=armv8-a --without-isl
> building binutils (+gdb commit db1ff28b60) and newlib (+cygwin commit
> c7806ef76a) on the same tree. I'm afraid this is going to be very hard to
> debug if I can't duplicate it. Any chance you could build a toolchain that
> works on some machine on the gcc build farm, so that I could get access to
> it as well and debug from there, or at least try to figure out what the
> differences are between our setups? Thanks,
I can see that this is a regression from GCC 5 - however something is fishy
here.
Is there a chance Kyrill and you have different --enable-checking options ?
