https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53694
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
More than three years ago Tobias Burnus wrote
> Actually, I am no longer sure that this PR is valid - nor is Richard Maine
> in c.l.f. Janus seems to have the same doubts, if I read comment 5 correctly.
>
> The standard seems to make a distinction between 'generic type-bound
> procedure'
> and 'generic procedure name'.
Any reason to keep this PR opened?
Note that the tests now fail with
Error: INTENT(OUT) argument 'a' of pure procedure 'scalar_equals_field' at (1)
may not be polymorphic
