https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68114
Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
| |com
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> ---
I disagree. According to [dcl.fct] p11 of the current working draft:
"The type of a parameter or the return type for a function definition shall not
be an incomplete (possibly cv-qualified) class type in the context of the
function
definition unless the function is deleted (8.4.3)."
This wording came in via
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1394
Clang does not accept the code example, but that looks like a clang defect to
me.
