https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47469
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > Tobias' version is prettier! Does it apply without regressions? Obviously the patch in comment 0 no longer applies. Now finding 'gfc_expr_attr (expr2).pointer' prettier than 'expr2->symtree->n.sym->attr.pointer' is just a matter of taste (29 characters compared to 35). For a newbie like the later is easier to understand than the former. BTW what should it be for 'value.function.esym'?
