https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67615
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #3) > This patch to resolve.c catches the problem. Watch for > cut-n-paste corruption of tabs. > > @@ -10377,12 +10381,11 @@ gfc_resolve_code (gfc_code *code, gfc_na > } > > case EXEC_ARITHMETIC_IF: > - if (t > - && code->expr1->ts.type != BT_INTEGER > - && code->expr1->ts.type != BT_REAL) > - gfc_error ("Arithmetic IF statement at %L requires a numeric " > - "expression", &code->expr1->where); > > + if (t && (code->expr1->rank > 0 || !gfc_numeric_ts > (&code->expr1->ts))) > + gfc_error ("Arithmetic IF statement at %L requires a scalar " > + "numeric expression", &code->expr1->where); > + > resolve_branch (code->label1, code); > resolve_branch (code->label2, code); > resolve_branch (code->label3, code); > > Whoops. Needs for for BT_COMPLEX. Better patch @@ -10377,12 +10381,13 @@ gfc_resolve_code (gfc_code *code, gfc_na } case EXEC_ARITHMETIC_IF: - if (t - && code->expr1->ts.type != BT_INTEGER - && code->expr1->ts.type != BT_REAL) - gfc_error ("Arithmetic IF statement at %L requires a numeric " - "expression", &code->expr1->where); + if (t && (code->expr1->rank > 0 + || !(code->expr1->ts.type == BT_REAL + || code->expr1->ts.type == BT_INTEGER))) + gfc_error ("Arithmetic IF statement at %L requires a scalar " + "REAL or INTEGER expression", &code->expr1->where); + resolve_branch (code->label1, code); resolve_branch (code->label2, code); resolve_branch (code->label3, code);