https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67513
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #7) > FYI I'd prefer to keep current BIT_IOR_EXPR approach in > asan_expand_check_ifn as it allows for efficient implementation for ARM > targets (as compared to two successive branches currently used in LLVM). Aha. Then I don't know if we want to change this. Please someone decide ;).
