https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ryabinin.a.a at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #2)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > so it fails on purpose (not sure why though). And it ignores always-inline.
> > I wonder if we should, for always-inline functions, inline anyway and output
> > a warning instead.
>
> We prohibited this combination during ASan integration to kernel. Both
> always_inline and no_sanitize_address are strong requirements for compiler
> i.e. dropping any of these in favor of another would have unexpected effects
> and hurt usability.
Nope, it was prohibited because no_sanitize_address didn't work for inlined
function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600.
