https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114
--- Comment #3 from Cezary Śliwa <sliwa at ifpan dot edu.pl> --- Yes, I understand. The purpose of the patch is to point the problem. In particular I don't know why operator< is needed and what are the required semantics (i.e. comparing pointers vs. comparing thread sequence numbers; what is the x field in the struct?). I am also concerned if the current implementation of pthread_equal in the w32-pthreads library is correct in this respect.
