https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
--- Comment #36 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > but also feel that those two statements hashing differently is not really > helpful! Well, it still uses hash_tree_expr (now 'add_expr') which has to be compatible with operand_equal_p, not just with finding redundancies.
