https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66790
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2015-07-29
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So what is the issue with replacing zero-extending an uninitialized %ebp
with a random other value? Both are essentially undefined when reached via
the somlabel bypass.
Is the real issue happening in a downstream pass? I don't think REE does
anything wrong here.
