https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66885
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1)
> The second condition is *not* always false.
After some further thought, agreed.
Would this be more clearly coded as
switch (bytes % 4)
{
case 1:
case 3:
max = 16;
break;
case 2:
max = 32;
break;
case 0:
max = 64;
break;
}
or maybe even faster, some table lookup.
