https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Jason McG <jmcguiness at liquidcapital dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
--- Comment #5 from Jason McG <jmcguiness at liquidcapital dot com> ---
Hang on: what has the ABI got to do with this? This discussion has got side
tracked onto a red herring. The code emitted by gcc apparently *eventually*
calls __cxa_pure_virtual, as we know. The signature of __cxa_pure_virtual could
be irrelevant: what is relevant is the *code path* that calls this function.
The code path could be enhanced to provide the extra information to the user.
The ABI function can then be left as is.
So I've re-opened the enhancement request.
