https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66119
James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jgreenhalgh at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, sorry for the delay - this completely slipped my mind. I'll start working
on it today.
I think I'm going to go back to the design in some of the earlier proposals for
r217191 and move the call to the hookized MOVE_RATIO in to SRA. It makes the
logic a little messier, as we have to check for parameters, then call off to
the target if they are not set. But that will be the only way we can permit
modifying MOVE_RATIO on a per-function basis. The end result should look
something like
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02267.html
