https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55805
Gubbins <dave.gittins at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dave.gittins at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from Gubbins <dave.gittins at gmail dot com> ---
The original bug report points that in C++11 this is *not* aggregate
initialization, but is in fact value initialization (because this is a class
type with a default constructor).
Therefore no field initializers are involved. The warning in this situation is
surely incorrect? I think the original bug report was correct and the problem
should be fixed.
