https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #19 from rusty at rustcorp dot com.au --- I like WUR as a sanity-check, and it is useful that more and more library authors are using it (generally quite well). As Andrew points out, this has taken 10 years! The downside is that false positives are becoming more common. For example, gnulib also includes a routine to handle this, since 2008: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=blob;f=lib/ignore-value.h;h=68521edb38f50cb2230c8560a125864be212db6a;hb=HEAD I believe that changing conditions call for a re-evaluation. And yes, I'd like to see a comment on any cast-to-void, not just for WUR. Thanks for your patience!
