https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66493
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Some who understands the internals of type bound procedures will need to
expand my patch. The patch cures the ICE in comment #1. I've attached
two test programs. The 1st one does not use TBP. The 2nd one does. I
get
gfc6 -o z gfc6 -o z alternate_return_2.f90 && ./z
alternate_return_2.f90:30:17:
call argh%bar(*10, *20)
1
Error: Syntax error in argument list at (1)
The reason is that whoever write the TBP code did not consider
the possibility of alternate return. I don't blame them. I
simply don't know how to fix it.
