https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66265
--- Comment #2 from Mark <gougolith at gmail dot com> --- Yes thank you, it all makes sense unfortunately...it is all buried in -O2... On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:50 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66265 > > Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED > CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org > Resolution|--- |INVALID > > --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > There is a warning with -Wstrict-aliasing=1 , if you read the > documentation, > you'd find there are various levels that differ in the amount of false > positives. The code is obviously invalid. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. >
