https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66110
Kevin OConnor <kevin at koconnor dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Kevin OConnor <kevin at koconnor dot net> ---
I understand that it is not incorrect to produce two redundant stores with the
sample code. However, I do believe it would be correct to produce a single
store.
As such, I think this is an opportunity to improve gcc's optimization. That
is, I think gcc could validly interpret the C spec so that two redundant
uint8_t stores could be replaced with one.
If this is not the best place to discuss that, what would be the best forum?
