https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65908
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5) > Yep, I suppose we want to match both (TREE_TYPE/TYPE_ARG_TYPES and the decls > since both control how calls.c produce code and should agree in equivalent > functions anyway. I will look into why TREE_TYPE (fntype) and TREE_TYPE > (result_decl) disagreees. OK, I'm going to write a patch that will match both. Martin
