https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65765
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Looks good to me, though the "obvious" part alone would be fine for 5.1 as well (even obvious - heh).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65765
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Looks good to me, though the "obvious" part alone would be fine for 5.1 as well (even obvious - heh).