https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65751
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-04-13
CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Shouldn't it be rather
@@ -3632,9 +3632,9 @@ gfc_check_pointer_assign (gfc_expr *lval
|| (lvalue->ts.type == BT_DERIVED
&& (lvalue->ts.u.derived->attr.is_bind_c
|| lvalue->ts.u.derived->attr.sequence))))
- gfc_error ("Data-pointer-object &L must be unlimited "
+ gfc_error ("Data-pointer-object at %L must be unlimited "
"polymorphic, a sequence derived type or of a "
- "type with the BIND attribute assignment at %L "
+ "type with the BIND attribute assignment "
"to be compatible with an unlimited polymorphic "
"target", &lvalue->where);
else
?
